Ku Keon Kang vs Ivan Denisov Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W L W W W W L
Form
L L L W L W L W W LHead-To-Head: Kang 1 - 0 Denisov
They have played 2 sets in total, with Kang winning 2 and Denisov winning 0. The last match between Kang and Denisov was at the M15 Antalya, 04-12-2023, Q2 round, Clay with Ku Keon Kang getting the victory 6-4 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ku Keon Kang | 1 |
| Ivan Denisov | 0 |
M15 Antalya(04-12-2023)
6
4
6
1
| Kang | Stats | Denisov |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 50% (4-4) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| N/A | Ranking | N/A |
| Highest Rank | N/A | |
| 28 | Age | 24 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 58% (87-62) | Career Total W/L | 47% (100-111) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Fritz VS Bonzi PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Kudermetova VS Kostyuk PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-1 |
Stats 
Ku Keon Kang
Player
Ivan Denisov
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
19 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:33:0 | Average Match Time | 1:33:0 |
| 75% (36/48) | 1st Serve % | 61% (30/49) |
| 58% (21/36) | 1st Serve Win % | 53% (16/30) |
| 67% (8/12) | 2nd Serve Win % | 21% (4/19) |
| 75% (6/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 67% (2/3) |
| 59% (29/49) | Return Points Win % | 40% (19/48) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Ku Keon Kang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Edward Winter
Player
Ku Keon Kang
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
75%
(
45 of
60)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ku Keon Kang
Player
Kazuki Nishiwaki
74%
(
67 of
91)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
37%
(
34 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
88
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ku Keon Kang
Player
Daiki Yoshimura
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
50 of
75)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
24 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
68
Total Points Won
63
|
2-6 6-2 10-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Ku Keon Kang
Player
Yan Cheng Chen
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
8
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
15 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
37 of
61)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Louroi Martinez
Player
Ku Keon Kang
51%
(
31 of
61)
1st Serve %
70%
(
43 of
61)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
43%
(
26 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
62
Total Points Won
60
|
1-6 6-2 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Ku Keon Kang
Player
Ivan Denisov
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
19 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Pol Amoros Ramos
Player
Ku Keon Kang
50%
(
24 of
48)
1st Serve %
81%
(
35 of
43)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
0
63%
(
15 of
24)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
79%
(
19 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ku Keon Kang
Player
Dong Ju Kim
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
60%
(
21 of
35)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Ivan Denisov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Khazime
Player
Ivan Denisov
54%
(
47 of
87)
1st Serve %
78%
(
71 of
91)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
36 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
92
Total Points Won
86
|
6-4 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ivan Denisov
Player
Ivan Kremenchutskyi
68%
(
49 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
79
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(3) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Lucio Ratti
Player
Ivan Denisov
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
75)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 6-7(5) 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros
Player
Ivan Denisov
75%
(
60 of
80)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
31 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
76
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ivan Denisov
Player
Kousuke Ogura
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve %
50%
(
24 of
48)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Guy Den Ouden
Player
Ivan Denisov
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolas Rafael Goldberg Alviani
Player
Ivan Denisov
60%
(
12 of
20)
1st Serve %
70%
(
16 of
23)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
0
92%
(
11 of
12)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
11 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
4 of
20)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
24
Total Points Won
19
|
5-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Saveliy Ivanov
Player
Ivan Denisov
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
71%
(
44 of
62)
3
Aces
13
3
Double Faults
6
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
35 of
44)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
21 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
18 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (87/62) | Win/Loss | 47% (100/111) |
| 56% (183/142) | Sets Win/Loss | 50% (242/243) |
| 55% (1555/1273) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (2370/2314) |
| 59% (67/46) | Hard Win/Loss | 41% (29/41) |
| 59% (20/14) | Clay Win/Loss | 52% (63/59) |
| 0% (0/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 42% (8/11) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.02 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
| 34 | Aces Total | 313 |
| 0.05 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 63 | Total Double Faults | 378 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:2:12 |
| 316.18 | Average Opponent Rank | 306.57 |
| 73% (2048/2794) | 1st Serve % | 60% (4786/7967) |
| 60% (1229/2048) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (3121/4786) |
| 49% (368/747) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (1576/3181) |
| 51% (144/285) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (344/843) |
| 43% (1179/2763) | Return Points Win % | 41% (3295/8105) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/3) | Challenger W/L | 38% (5/8) |
| 60% (87/59) | Futures W/L | 48% (95/102) |
| 59% (84/143) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 48% (99/208) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 22% (4/18) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 45% (20/44) |
| 66% (21/32) | Deciding Set Win % | 34% (22/64) |
| 94% (80/75) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (107/86) |
| 6% (80/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 20% (107/21) |
| 17% (69/12) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (104/14) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
